Last week City Manager Russell Allen put forward a new proposal on moving forward with the Clarence E. Lightner Public Safety Center using a new funding model. Allen proposed that there would be no property tax increase and that funding would be borrowed and played out over the next several years. Today Allen went into detail on his plan. Allen cited the reasons it makes sense for moving forward on Lightner now:
Aleen also went on to cite costs that have already been sunk in ancillary projects that were to be funded along with Lightner and have to be funded regardless of Lightner’s status. Allen is perusing more value engineering in the project. Allen said that additional funds would be needed in the next few years: $2 Million in 2012, $3 Million in 2013 and $4 Million in 2014. The plan means that many of the other public works projects bundled with Lightner particularly the remote ops plans would not be moving forward. Allen stressed that every passing week means significant loss in savings across the different benefits.
Mayor Meeker suggested creating an independent group to study Lightner Center, that group would be formed by experts and their research would be based on data. Russ Stephenson reiterated that this group should be data driven, and repeatedly said ‘focused on proper siting.’ Stephenson has repeatedly stressed along with Thomas Crowder that they are unhappy with the location of the center.
John Odom recommended that Lightner be put to public vote in the fall.
Allen reiterated that this discussion is about more than Lightner and that council needs to approve some of the remote ops project funding. Allen asked the council to apply $46 million in bonds to move forward with the remote ops centers. This funding may or may not be used but would go to cover the remote ops projects. In the end council approved going forward with applying for the bonds, with John Odom as the only vote against.
Politics , Other posts by David.
Thomas Crowder Mayor Meeker Russ Stephenson Clarence E. Lightner Public Safety Center Russell Allen
And the beat goes on….
The study is a way for the Mayor and Council to continue discussions and negotiations in a back room instead of in the public eye. Given the hard positions that have already been taken, I have a hard time imagining that this will actually be an apolitical, data-driven decision—especially as we get closer to the next municipal election. But let’s see. In the meantime it has good optics for the Mayor and Council.
Give us our pretty new tall building!
Wait, I mean, give our public safety officers the resources they deserve!!
I wish I was an expert on something and I had a group of friends that were also experts on something. Then we would all be millionaires. Millions of dollars are thrown away each yr. on the “Expert” study groups and for what? Why do we need these study groups to tell us things the Mayor and city council should already know? The most frustrating thing about the study group phenomenon is all the money wasted, only to see the project(s) never happen.
Share Your Thoughts
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.