Thursday, September 18, 2008

Politics

Mayor, Councilman Stalling Heather Vance for Planning Commission

The City Council is considering the next Planning Commission appointee.  The Planning Commission, with a couple or three exceptions, is stacked with (1) developers, (2) developers’ consultants, and (3) random people who know little about planning.

For the current opening, a Raleigh citizen named Heather Vance has been nominated and is willing to serve.  She has a degree in planning as well as the professional certification in the field (AICP).  She has worked as a transportation planning consultant and as a local government planner.  She currently is the Communications Director for the American Institute of Architects, North Carolina chapter.

She is eminently well qualified to be on the Planning Commission, and the city is fortunate that she is willing to serve:  the role is entirely volunteer, and consumes at least a half-day each week, or over 200 hours per year.

On top of all that, she happens to be a black woman, and there are currently only two women and one black person on the 11-member board.

With the board in such desperate need of talent and expertise, and growth and planning and design issues so very pressing in our city, you would think she’d be a shoo-in.  But her appointment is being held up by Mayor Meeker and, of all things imaginable, Councilor James West of District C, who is continually saying that minorities need better representation on city boards.

For years, there haven’t been enough progressives on City Council for a voting majority.  District councilors who wanted to get things done had to side with developers’ interests, pitting plurality against plurality with their “swing” vote, and extracting concessions from one side or the other in the process.  That’s what any effective councilor naturally does when not in the majority. 

But now that there’s a four-vote progressive bloc on the eight-member Council, nothing stands in the way of a five-vote majority—with Southeast Raleigh forming the critical fifth vote. 

That’s Crowder, McFarlane, Stephenson, Koopman, and—West?

At long last, Southeast Raleigh stands with the potential for real majority voting power, able to do so much more to advance the interests of the neighborhoods.

It’s the local equivalent of the Obama transformation:  Transcending race, the Council is poised, finally, to deal with the pressing issues that are facing all citizens across Raleigh—taking the costs of growth off of the backs of the general taxpayers, improving the transit system, strengthening neighborhoods, protecting the drinking water supply, helping young people succeed with education and opportunity, and ensuring that new development takes the form of great new places instead of just more oil-dependent sprawl.

Only Mayor Meeker and Councilor West know the real reasons they are withholding their support from the black woman who is, far and away, the best-qualified candidate for the Planning Commission.

But some think the dynamic behind this apparent stall-out might be explained here.

“Power is not gained by hoarding it, it’s gained by sharing it ... if the Old Guard is afraid to reach back and mentor the next generation that wants to be in this realm of electoral politics ... that younger generation is going to elbow them in the face, and they’re going to find themselves on the sideline as the next generation takes their seats away.“—State Rep. Ty Harrell

  • Kurt09/18 01:09 PM

    I think you answered your own question in the first sentence.

  • RaleighRob09/18 01:29 PM

    Something smells rotten here.  Has any other councilors said why they wouldn’t support her?  She sounds ideal, so I gotta wonder what the deal is!

  • Doctor_Feelgood09/18 03:28 PM

    RaleighRob, you are absolutely right.

    James West, after consulting with the leadership of District C, submitted the name of a District C resident with credentials and the full faith and support of the Districts Leadership.

    There is an ongoing BATTLE between the WAKE UP members of the Raleigh City Council and the only minority representative, James West.

    Thomas Crowder, after West made his nomination, went into District C, recruited Heather Vance, did not consult with either West or any of the leadership of District C and then had Nancy McFarlane submitt Heather Vance’s name.  This was done to side step the idea that one loyal democrat would subvert the interest of another democrat in a election year.  Nancy is Independent.

    So we now have a battle Royal with those outside of District C, including Ty Harrell, sticking their noses into the affairs of district C to be divisive. 

    I know several people reached out to Heather Vance to her to talk with James West but she decided that rather than be respectful of the history of how blacks even got to be at the council table she decided to let Crowder et. al. use her to harass and disrespect Mayor Pro Tem James West and the District C political leadership in general.

    I applaud our Mayor Charles Meeker, At-Large member Mary-Ann Baldwin, Philip Isely and Mayor Pro Tem James West for standing up to the bullies that are trying to tear apart district c and now even pit ty harrell against dan blue; anything to win regardless of the consequences.

    At a time when we need to come together to address the serious financial hardships everyone is now facing this group of people have decided to take our focus off the issues we need to address together and to pitch a mean spirited fight, a wedge issue if you will, to have their way.

    On a note of interest to everyone, Stan Norwalk is the dean of this school of thought that people, especially the black leadership are too stupid to decided what is best for them so it is in their best interest that his followers do the thinking for them.

    Bottom line, District C elected James West.  James West consulted with District C and submitted a nominee.  Crowder, District D, did not agree and solicited another.  Did not submit the name himself.  Had Nancy Mc Farlane submit the name.  And then watched as this council split 4-4 to show his power and willingness to embarass a sitting member and fellow council person.  This is our Council working at its finess.

    And as far as developers go.  I can imagine there are a lot of households wish developers were still developing now.  The industry they represented provided a lot of jobs, taxes and fees that we are now going to have to replace with tax payer money.  I would be careful of how I cast disparaging remarks about one group only to have the rank and file taxpayer pay for that mean spirited indifference.

    Capisci,

    The Doctor

  • Heather Vance09/18 03:56 PM

    Danny,

    First, I hope you won’t mind me addressing you personally. I don’t like to use a pseudonym to speak. I believe transparency is admirable, and will conduct myself accordingly.

    Next, I did reach out ot Councilman West. Maybe you can submit portions of the email I responded back to you where I explained that I did, in fact, spend time speaking with him.

    Finally, I will posit the follwing: when I moved to Raleigh, NC, i made it a point to do two things: meet with the Mayor, and meet with my Councilman, Mr. West. This was in 2002. I did this with the intention of expressing my interest in service and my expertise in planning. When I mentioned this fact to Dr. West recently, he remembered our conversation, and in fact, noted that he was sorry he didn’t remember to think of me for this position. Additionally, he has come to know me through my particiaption with SERA, as were all other members of the council. We’re not strangers to one another, and this is less of a sporadic decision than you might make it out to be.

    Danny, I think that your interest in avoiding disparaging remarks might be skillfully applied to this situation. I am saddened by the insinuations about my nomination, if only because they presuppose my inability to think for myself. I would argue that I haven’t come to this point in my professional or personal life by lacking independent thought or foregtting the struggle; rather, I am motivated by it every day. The struggle is economic, geographic and political as well as racial; it is infused with emotion, relevance, consternation and exclaimation. It is punctuated, in this case, by a lack of trust. I understand all of these things. I do not avoid these truths.

    Danny, I am no more a tool than you are. In fact, as I stated to you in my email this past week, I believe all public servants are tools, willing to listen to a sometimes fervent public and make valid, well-considered decisions that do the best work possible given the facts on hand at the time. We are not that different, and in the end, we will share the same fate.

    Hopefully, we can continue this discourse. I appreciate everyone’s right to voice their opinions. In fact, I would have been more than happy to watch this particular blog discussion unfold without my participation. I find it important, however, to respond accordingly when I am maligned without reason. Please do not unfairly characterize my actions as disrespect; and at least, Danny, consult me when making accusations about my character or actions. I will offer you the same respect and care.

    No matter how this unfolds, I am always open for conversation. Feel free to email me at my personal account: .

    Thank you.
    Heather Q. Vance, AICP
    Director of Programs and Communications, AIA NC

  • Doctor_Feelgood09/18 05:12 PM

    First Ms. Vance, Dan Coleman did share your e-mails with Dr. West with the members of the Raleigh Wake Citizens Association, an organization with over 75 years of history bringing people together to accomplish great things in Raleigh and Wake County. (get copied by members of the RWCA)

    Second, this does not have anything to do with you but the arrogance of others to work around Dr. West, though you are trying to justopose yourself into the matter for your gain and their desire to destroy James West.

    Third, unfortunately you are now a part of a political tug of war.  The line being; will Raleigh City Council members act civil and consult their fellow members, especially when they reach over the aisle and try to do something in another’s district without their concurrence.

    You are being played like a fiddle and unfortunately your youthful exuberance is almost becoming hubris.

    Not to worry the battle lines have been drawn positions taken, fortifications enhanced and other political gains or losses put into play.

    Let’s play ball my dear.  I think this excercise will do great things to bring the african american community in SE Raleigh together and we will all thank you for providing the wedge issue that will accomplish that goal.

    I will share with you this quote that Daniel shared with the RWCA from one of your e-mails.

    “...In this case, I believe there is a substantive job which must be undertaken and the duty to that work is greater than paying homage to any incumbent Councilman in hopes of being part of the meritocracy….“ I assume you were addressing James West, the elected representative for District C. 

    Now exactly why would anyone want someone as divisive as you on any planning commission?

    Capisci,

  • Heather Vance09/18 05:17 PM

    I appreciate your response.

    I think it would be good to include my whole quote, not the part that suits your argument only.

    Hubris may be a fair assessment. I’ll take your thoughts under advisement.

    Assumptions are dangerous - If I would have meant Dr. West, I would have said Dr. West. I do not use veiled language. I meant exactly what was written. I stand by those words.

    Thank you,
    Heather Vance

  • Matthew Brown09/18 05:55 PM

    My goodness, this is a bewildering exchange, and I don’t yet know what to make of it. I am a long-time resident of District C who happens to be white. I have always felt that Dr. West represented us well, and I believe most of my neighbors would agree. Yet we would also agree that Mayor Meeker, Russ Stephenson, and Mary-Ann Baldwin – for whom we also voted—have represented us well. They don’t always agree on every vote – who does? – but they are honest, intelligent, hard-working people who do their best to serve their citizens. And they share the same political philosophy, the most important tenet of which is that they want the best for all citizens of Raleigh regardless of race or income.

    In whose interest, then, would it be to drive a wedge between these good folks? Perhaps someone who does not share that political philosophy. Just who is being played here? Perhaps both of the above letter writers. Perhaps all the above-mentioned members of the Council. Who will lose if this battle is engaged? Perhaps the people who admire both of the above letter writers, and all of the above-mentioned members of the Council, myself included.

  • go go girl09/18 06:34 PM

    Let’s play ball my dear.


    Bewildering and condescending.

  • David09/18 06:48 PM

    Dr Feelgood accusing her of hubris as he spouts metaphors of war.
    Bewildering and hilarious.

  • Positive Citizen Engagement09/18 07:04 PM

    Danny, you falsely reported a 4-4 PC vote above. 

    The real vote (according to the City Clerk) was Fleming – 1, Vance – 4.

  • Doctor_Feelgood09/18 07:12 PM

    I think Mathew Brown is a great person and have watched him work with the adjoinging communities over the years.  I hope he gets a chance to serve on the Historic Districts soon, Oakwood could have no greater standard bearer than Mathew.

    Heather, I hate you have been thrown into all of this unnecessary chatter.  We are fortunate to have both you and your husband residing in Raleigh.

    In the end, as we watch everyday the latest kernal of bad financial news or issues about lipstick on farm animals we have to ask ourselves when do we get to the business of picking ourselves up, bootstrapping if you will, and set a course of mutural respect for everyone in regards to their ability to secure life, liberty and the happiness that John and Thomas so eloquently set to words all those many years ago.

    One for all and all for one.  The very best basis for our Raleigh City Council.

  • Enigma09/18 10:41 PM

    Setting the race card aside, I think the underlying question remains unanswered: What ulterior motives would warrant ANY councilor’s entry into another councilor’s district for the sole purpose of secretly handpicking and then nominating their preferred planning commission member, verses the choice of that district’s leadership?  I sense there has to be a lot more to this story…

  • Speaktruth09/18 10:43 PM

    Appointments to the Planning Commission are made by majority vote of the City Council.  It would be nice if every district got a pick, but that’s not the case.

  • Speaktruth09/18 10:46 PM

    Also, the candidate whom Danny apparently so strongly supports is the same candidate that he initially tried to have thrown under the bus so that he himself, Danny, could be appointed.  That didn’t work out too well.  Now Danny appears to be the most vigorous supporter of the very person that he initially undercut.

    But what can you expect from someone with multiple criminal convictions.

  • Speaktruth09/18 10:52 PM

    Danny, if you could show us even one other person who agrees with your version of things, your threat to spank anyone who opposes you might have a hint of credibility.  You’ve already committed to sic the Raleigh Wake Citizens Assocation, the Southeast Raleigh Assembly, the District C Citizens Advisory Council’s, the churches in District C, the local NAACP chapter, and any other organization you can think of, to vote against every white Democrat who doesn’t see things your way and act accordingly. 

    Does any of these organizations even know that you’re speaking for them?  Is there even one other person that’s committed to taking the actions you’ve promised?  Since you’re apparently the ONLY signatory to your unilateral declaration of war, how desperate will you be to convince these organizations to climb on board your crazywagon?  Will you say or do ANYTHING to get your way?

  • brian_M09/18 11:06 PM

    This whole conversation is nutty. Not intriguing, not interesting, and most specifically, not important.

  • Positive Citizen Engagement09/18 11:22 PM

    If you really feel that way, Brian—that our choice of people, such as Planning Commissioners, who make the decisions that build our city,  is BORING and UNIMPORTANT,—

    —then Brian, please make sure you don’t ever complain about any of the following:
    - * a lack of transit options in Raleigh,
    * property taxes, whether high or low,
    * anything having to do with sprawl,
    * downtown,
    * walkable neighborhoods, and vibrant mixed-use centers,
    * bike facilities and sidewalks,
    * great nightlife and entertainment districts,
    * parks, ballfields, and swimming pools that are not overcrowded or too far to get to from your house,
    * abundant clean water for your lawn and your gullet,
    ... etc., etc.

    NOTHING is more important or interesting, than the building of our community.  It’s called the Project of Civilization, and it is not an exercise in irony.

  • brian_M09/18 11:33 PM

    Yes, all those things are important, PCE. The back and forth above, however, is not. I don’t need any lectures from you, either. Thanks!

  • Enigma09/18 11:49 PM

    Very ironical this topic is being discussed on the same day Raleigh received the “most political city” award.  Could that designation really mean Raleigh is the most politically tainted city?

  • hmm.09/19 01:53 AM

    cant we just all agree that sarah palin has nice glasses?

  • Steve W09/19 02:42 PM

    I am really disappointed with Mr. Coleman for saying sweet things to WakeUP in private and being involved in our efforts to promote transit, and then trashing the organization in public.

  • dan coleman09/19 10:47 PM

    Someone called me and told me to go to this site and read the stuff being posted.  So here goes.

    Steve W., I am personally disappointed with Wake Up because Wake Up is trying to do something good on transit yet some of the very ones who steered me to Wake Up are disrespecting my city Council representative.

    You allege my sweet talk is in private, but I have been very visible in my support of the work Ms. Karen Rindge on behalf of transit and I have supported that effort 100% and have attended both public and private meetings in that effort. 

    I have reached out across this city trying to bring people together since before you were born I suspect.  I even talk with you quite often though I am beginning to understand that you talk to people.

    But I have to tell you that everyone who we need to bring to the table to make transit work worries that Wake Up has a hidden agenda and that agenda is sticking the development community at every chance the cost of growth, the cost of everything when the solution is far more complex than the simple sounding sound bites that seem to create so much noise and drives people apart as and not together.

    The RWCA co-sponsored the Transit Forum this past June with Wake Up (you consider that private right) and I consider myself a founding member of Captial Area Friends of Transit and really appreciate the leadership of Ms. Rindge.  But being disrespectful to West is not the way to bringing this city together.

    Last night at the regular monthly meeting of the RWCA, Councilman Rodger Koopman attended and reaffirmed the close relationship that District C and B have had over the years.  He and Councilman West and I had a frank discussion of the unvarnished facts before the body and I think they are going to go forward with an already identifiable and existing mutual respect for one another and put this planning commission issue in the rear view mirror.

    Now if you think that Wake Up and the RWCA can no longer work together on transit because I say one thing in private and another in public, even though the facts and events do not bear that idea out then so be it.

    Sincerely,

    Dan Coleman

  • Steve W09/19 11:09 PM

    Dan Coleman,

    Do you seriously expect anyone to believe that Doctor Feelgood is someone other than yourself?

    And do you seriously believe that WakeUP Wake County had anything to say about who replaces Dennis Davis?

    I think you are lying on both counts.

  • Positive Citizen Engagement09/20 12:58 AM

    Someone told ME to go and look at

    http://www.belowthebeltline.org/frames-lane/lane.htm

    for more on this affair ...

  • Enigma09/20 03:06 PM

    Maybe it’s a coincidence but this issue has become even more intriguing given today’s N&O story about the same city councilor quartet (Crowder, Stevenson, McFarlane, Koopman).  Whether there’s a connection or not, this covert team action smells similar to the unethical secret obstructionism meetings they’ve been having to control votes on council.  The commonality of both cries for the need of further investigation.

  • Positive Citizen Engagement09/20 04:31 PM

    The developers’ shills on Council are just angry that they’re being left out. 

    The discussions among the pro-citizen members of Council are within the law and within ethical rules.


    As far as “controlling votes on Council,“ which you apparently equate with obstructionsim—somebody has to win, and it might as well be the citizen taxpayers instead of sprawl developers for a while !

  • Ron B09/21 03:40 PM

    This site ate my last post, so here is the cliff notes:

    - Commissioner West ignored ciziten input provided via the small area plan for the Peace Street McDonalds, siding with the devlopers to do whatever they want.  Why should anyone respect his input?

    Mr. Coleman has a history of acting in the best interests of himself, not the people he allegedly represents:

    - East Vision process was supposed to solicit resident input for the area just east of downtown.  After a year of meetings and paid consultants investigating the area, the “District C leadership” decided to take it out of the hands of the residents and discuss it among themselves, with only one actual resident (former South Central CAC chair Jeff DeBellis) on the “ad hoc committee”.

    - The Martin-Haywood redevlopment plan has been stalled for years because the rest of the neighborhood and the city do not want Mr. Coleman’s vision of nothing but Habitat For Humanity houses for all land the city owns near the intersection of East Martin and Haywood.

    - Mr. Coleman pushed his CAC to get approval for the city to forego the normal Request For Proposals process and sell the Stone Warehouse property to him at its 2000 tax value and not expect payment for several years.  A blantant conflict of interests, and the city continues to do nothing with property that could be contributing to the tax coffers.

    Having Heather Vance on the Planning Commission scares the “District C leadrship” because Southeast Raleigh residents have taken it on the chin for decades due to their lack of knoweledge on planning and redevelopment issues.  District C leadership stopped being about “justice” a long time ago—now it is “just us”.  That needs to change or the area will continue to miss out on the opportunities visible a few blocks to the west in the core of downtown.

  • Sallie09/22 12:22 AM

    Here-here Ron B.

    As a resident of SE, I am absolutely sick and tired of Danny Coleman and James West - they are a blight on the area and are completely preventing positive changes from taking place.

    Both are self-serving powermongers who have everyone’s lips sewn shut for fear of being called “racist” if they dare to disagree with whatever ridiculous plans they’re cooking up - especially Danny. Stone’s Warehouse is a PERFECT example of this - what a joke, and the City should be ashamed. And James West - what has be actually done for his district. Secured an aquatics center for Chavis which would have funneled much needed improvement dollars into the area? Nope, despite the fact that he told the CAC he was pushing for it, he stabbed everyone in the back, pressuring other council members to locate it in NoRal. His explanation to an incensed CAC? If I support other people’s projects, then maybe I can get support for mine. Uhhh…okay - still waiting on those projects, James!

    Ms. Vance would be a wonderful asset to the commission, and a valuable representative for the area.

Welcome to New Raleigh. We welcome your participation in the ongoing discussion. Before posting we ask that you read our Comment Policy and we invite you to register with our site. If you want to keep up with the news on our blog, subscribe to the RSS feed or get emailed every time we post.




Remember my information for next time I comment

Send me an email of follow-up comments?