WakeUP Wake County reporting in from the National Smart Growth Conference, held February 3-5, in the Queen City.
Communities all across the country are increasingly attuned to the reality that quality of life is directly connected to how we grow and develop. Smart growth, a public policy planning innovation, focuses on creating sustainable, high quality communities that are good for citizens and developersalike. Towns and experts from cross the U.S. met in Charlotte this past week to report success stories and challenges in efforts to build green, livable, walkable, prosperous cities and towns. Perhaps Charlotte was chosen to host the National Smart Growth Conferencebecause Charlotte has leveraged quality growth and development by designing more livable, attractive streets, creating urban infill, encouraging pedestrian activity, spurring mixed use development along transit lines, and including high quality affordable housing in the mix.
We're learning exciting, effective good growth planning strategies that Raleigh and Wake County could benefit from. Some important lessons highlighted at the conference:
Strategic Transportation and Land Use Planning
Water Quality Protection
Creating Housing Choices
In Raleigh we have the opportunity to create communities that reflect our values and sense of place if local governments show their leadership and stand up for high quality, yes, smart growth. Considering future population growth, Raleighites must work to ensure that our city is an even better place to live in the future. Raleigh is currently re-writing its development code, so citizens have an opportunity to speak up for smart growth! We also hope to see a referendum to help build a bus and rail transit plan that will better connect citizens across the community.
Planning Director for the City of Raleigh Mitchell Silver offered closing remarks at the National Smart Growth Conference, reporting on Raleigh's successes as a top-tier city and challenges as one of the most sprawled in the nation. The conference audience, people from across the nation and abroad, were shocked by the level of growth Raleigh has experienced and excited to see how our city is making strides to continue to sustain new growth in a more compact, walkable manner. As the baby boomer generation moves towards retirement and generation X and Y gain leadership in our community, new opportunities and challenges will arise. By applying smart growth principles, Raleigh can take advantage of demographic shifts and population growth to make our city an even better place to live!
WakeUP , Other posts by Andrew.
Downtown Raleigh City of Raleigh Transit Development Downtown Environment
Ha! Only completely idealistic liberals would think that the government could/should force rich people to live next to poor people. Its a nice idea but it will not happen. Poverty always brings crime and crime drives out the wealthy leaving downtown a slum. Its a fact.
Fact? Whatever Will. Our downtown already has $400k condos within a block or two of subsidized low-income apartments in several places. Not to mention historic victorian mansions down the street from tiny section 8 rentals.
Been that way for years now….this is nothing new. ![]()
....
That said…my complaint about downtown housing has always been too little is offered in the middle income ranges. But that’s gradually changing, I hope.
RaleighRob makes an interesting point - affordable housing options aren’t just for ‘poor’ people and cover a wide range of income levels. Workforce housing for our teachers, police officers, service industry, etc. is key for the long-term vitality of our community. These critical workforce groups are not necessarily able to afford a $400k condo and are being pushed further and further away from our urban centers. We need to retain our workforce if we expect to have teachers for our schools, waiters in restaurants, and police officers to protect us.
Where’s the beef? The lead in says “Raleigh is gaining momentum” but this whole post is mostly coulds and shoulds.
Rob,
Currently, you are correct but Downtown Raleigh is in transition from low income to high income housing. Do not think for a second that the wealthy investors will not try to push all lower income housing out to boost property values. Its just how the free market works and right now Raleigh has a free real estate market. You just have to look at all the sprawl to see that. I am just not convinced that the government could or should control where people live. Agree about midle class housing. No one right out of college with even a decent job can buy downtown. Also, I think a lot of those 400k condos are empty. If the government mandates a bunch of section 8 rentals to keep some sort of socio-economic diversity, it will drive high end investment out. If they give the market free reign, it will all be high end eventually. Its almost impossible to have a middle ground because people dont want a middle ground when it comes down to it. No one wants to live in a mansion with a trailer next to it.
Andrew,
They will probably have to commute just like in all other major cities. Which sucks but that is the way it is.
Thanks for this great report! It’s not about forcing anyone to do anything—it’s about creating more choices in housing and transportation.
Because of demographic changes especially, there is a growing market for walkable neighborhoods. Sometimes it’s just a matter of getting government out of the way, and letting the free market deliver what people want to buy.
“No one wants to live in a mansion with a trailer next to it.”
Yet I see that all the time in this state. Just because some upper class people are snobby elitists, doesn’t mean they all are.
And all that talk about “free market this, free market that”. Ain’t that the same free market that caused the housing bubble and thus this mess we’re trying to dig ourselves out of? The same free market that caused white flight and the suburban sprawl that mandates more and more highways to be built? Frankly, sounds to me like this free market thing isn’t as wonderful as some people like to make it out as.
The rich neighborhoods are boring! White and bland. The houses all look the same. Soccer moms. Triathelete dads.
I think the middle class market housing is the key. Improving housing to attract the middle class saves money and then it attacts high end investors and projects. Of course, they eventually forces out the middle class.
I remember when Oakwood was a slum.The gays and young people moved in. Fixed it up. Now, a typical young middleclass family couldn’t live there- only old retired yankees!
Steven,
“Sometimes it’s just a matter of getting government out of the way, and letting the free market deliver what people want to buy.”
If we let the free market deliver what people want, we will lose all our natural area (farms and forests) to sprawl. We will be county line to county line subdivisions with no trees, no fields, no natural area. But many developers will have made money as they move on to find other areas to destroy.
Susan A.
Agreed—sometimes the free market is the solution, and other times it’s the problem.
I don’t think anyone is saying that rich people should be forced to live next to poor people. But I do believe that our local government should take measures to entice people to live in dense urban clusters in order to preserve and enhance those natural resources that would otherwise be subject to development - i.e. drinking water sources, arable land and forests.
The free market is great at setting prices and bringing solutions to problems, yet can also cause problems when left unchecked. Just ask the American buffalo.
Sluv: ” But I do believe that our local government should take measures to entice people to live in dense urban clusters in order to preserve and enhance those natural resources that would otherwise be subject to development - i.e. drinking water sources, arable land and forests.”
Enticing people to live in dense urban clusters is something that the free market and local governments can do. However, it will not “preserve and enhance those natural resources…” as long as people want to live in those areas and developers are allowed to buy land in natural areas, clear cut the land, plant a subdivision, and sell houses there. We need to actively stop the development of our remaining natural land in the county.
Keep poor people out of sight and out of mind - until I need my yard mowed, groceries bagged and shoes shined. I’m in favor of a county wide subway system that can transport the poor from their little shanty towns on the extremes to their GED necessary jobs - this way I don’t have to worry about them driving near my car.
We also need to have a catch and release system for anyone that looks like they’d be “better off” living in Durham. they seem to tolerate that kind of people better in the squalor not owned by Jim Goodman.
As we know, all the poor can do for Wake County is steal our resources and abduct our children so they can buy more meth.
Raleigh Durham is growing like crazy. And not just growth for growth sake but smart people are moving to and staying in the Triangle area. Check out the following stat from EDIS:
North Carolina EDIS data shows more than 500,000 workers in the Raleigh-Durham area have an annual salary of greater than $50,000.
What about the fact that Raleigh Durham has grown 40% since 2000 and is expected to grow by 37% by 2020. To read more, visit: www.blog.xperience4higher.com
As several posts have said, until Raleigh can get crime & gangs under control in the areas that ALREADY have low income housing I don’t see how this will make our city better.
We bought into living in a “diverse” neighborhood - sounded good at the time, but now we have to deal with gangs, graffiti and constant theft… I don’t see the City of Raleigh investing in the manpower to deal with more of this… they certainly can’t contain in our ITB community.
Share Your Thoughts
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.