David Monday, August 20, 2007

Development

North Hills East & Kane: We Need Welfare

In grade school all of the developer’s kids were the ones with that extra sense of privilege- it seems so obvious now that they got it from their parents.  Raleigh is one of the fastest growing cities in the nation; as it grows, you have to wonder how the developers who profit most from this growth, acquired their sense of privilege.  It seems they are justified in this because much of the city and county commissioners agree developers should get what they want at the expense of citizen’s dollars. You may have been following our discussion of John Kane’s plan to get every tax paying citizen in Raleigh to pay for his parking decks.  After all, it is the citizens that will be blessed with his forth coming onslaught of Starbucks (the existing North-Hills-mush includes 3) and pseudo urban pastiche.

If Kane gets the money - what does this say to other developers?  Every time something is built- the necessary infrastructure will be subsidized? We will pacify whining developers when they cry about being picked on? It is not as if this area sits as ghetto or needs to incentivize shoppers.  The existing portion of North Hills is a Visa/Mastercard mecca and Kane can be assured the next portion will be too.  What do we owe to Kane, or any other commercial developer in North Raleigh if not healthy taxes to refund the city for all of its contributions to make these shopping centers function.  To think Council members constituents would support these expensive parking decks over infrastructure development, or that developers deserve assistance in building out commercial venues in the sprawling residential North Raleigh is ludicrous.

So now the County Commissioners unanimously approved the funding, while our city council sits divided.  Who are they helping with all of this?  I thought they served citizens? If Kane can muster another $600 million when we provide $75 million why can’t he just provide $675 million on his own?  Parking decks have been quite the controversy and our automobile society needs them to function properly. After all, this city isn’t providing inviting substantial transit, and the malls are making it as inconvenient as possible.

Rob Geary does a good job of describing the situation in the Indy last week:

Actually, Kane’s pitch is akin to the folks who cut taxes for the rich so the rest of us would be better off. Kane would like a tax cut on his North Hills East development so the rest of us Raleigh taxpayers, though seemingly stuck with a $75 million bill—or is it $140 million?—would be better off.

I don’t know John Kane. I’m told he’s a nice guy. And he’s done a good job of redeveloping, without subsidies, the old North Hills Mall. Nor is this issue of the parking decks about what he can do with North Hills East; Raleigh City Council has already given him the green light for most anything he wants over there, except that the buildings can’t be higher than 35 stories.

But if there’s one issue in the Raleigh elections that says it all about the candidates and where they stand on development issues, it’s Kane’s parking decks. Kane wants to borrow $75 million for parking decks that he’ll own, not the city; and he wants the taxpayers to pay off his debt by cutting taxes on North Hills East by about $140 million (his figure) over the period of his loans.

Don’t worry though folks- Kane’s sense of privilidge will prevail. Meeker’s adamant opposition is countered by a meek retort:

“I don’t understand why he’s attacking our project,’ Kane said.   ...   “At some point we’ll have to force the issue,” he said.

N&O

Mr. Kane, don’t threaten the city with a strip mall and claim you can’t do proper development unless we provide the infrastructure.  Our citizens will not benefit from this project in even a fraction of the scale that you and your investors will.  If anything we will be saddled with the poor traffic solutions you provide in that area, and 20 years of reduced tax revenue.  Developers have acted as profiteers in this city long enough, and you should be expected to do your due diligence before you can obtain that mountain of profits.

  • Vince08/20 02:28 PM

    Kane sounds like a Kreep.

  • Mark08/20 05:04 PM

    TIF is a valuable form of financing that makes many great projects possible for our community.  TIF so we can get more mall, further from downtown?  Forget it.

  • Dana08/21 05:06 PM

    The TIF is a valuable tool meant to entice developers to otherwise iffy areas. It seems that true conservatives would be against government assistance to those who can make it on their own. That’s what is said about those just off of welfare, right?

    NHE is not about “more mall”, but rather about increasing the density of an urban focus area. Raleigh will continue to grow. So do you want more perimeter sprawl or realignment of already-developed areas? NH is an urban growth center in the master plan for Raleigh, and a logical place to redevelop with density. The planned project is outstanding and I hope it gets built. However I wonder…if it’s such a home run for the taxpayers to finance, then why can’t a bank or REIT finance this project?

    While I agree with the overall point made in the article, the palpable disdain for people who have talent, work incredibly hard, and take risks is off putting. The incredibly inaccurate generalization of their offspring’s sense of entitlement is just a joke, right?

    No, Kane is a nice guy who has hit rock bottom more than once, who is just trying to use some government aid…kind of like those “rich” kids who apply for scholarships. What good are THEY worth?

  • David08/21 06:24 PM

    Too right Dana and I do wonder about the left/right division of this- so murky like other local political issues.  It does seem a bit of role reversal for the political parties and which side of this issue that they stand on. 
    The entitlement theme is built off of Kane’s own comments- sounding so much like a teenager who hasn’t gotten their way.  The parallel was too much to resist, particularly after NR’s run in with another developer’s offspring.

  • Mark08/21 07:53 PM

    I get a huge lump in my throat any time I think about calling North Hills an Urban area.  The only way it could be more sub-urban is if everything was one story and nobody lived there. 

    I would in fact rather have parking decks at North Hills than surface parking, but I don’t support pastiche mall development in any form.  If parking decks are the morally just thing to do in this case—and Kane almost seems to recognize this—then it’s not up to taxpayers to support it.  A developer shouldn’t compromise his or her own moral integrity for anything, and certainly shouldn’t threaten the city with sprawl. 

    However I wonder…if it’s such a home run for the taxpayers to finance, then why can’t a bank or REIT finance this project?

    Sounds like you just answered your own question: It’s not.  Like you said, this guy’s hit bottom more than once.  Good luck finding REIT partners, especially with this now-politically sensitive issue.

Welcome to New Raleigh. We welcome your participation in the ongoing discussion. Before posting we ask that you read our Comment Policy and we invite you to register with our site. If you want to keep up with the news on our blog, subscribe to the RSS feed or get emailed every time we post.




Remember my information for next time I comment

Send me an email of follow-up comments?