
Plans for sometime in Raleigh’s future: Light bluish or greenish = bike lanes. Brown and green = greenways. Purple = sharrows. Grey = major streets without bike facilities.
The small army of city and county officials who are in charge of drafting the Raleigh 2030 Comprehensive Plan have been dealing with a mountain of issues and information. The Bike Facilities Map looks like the work of a strung-out spider with a box of rainbow sharpies. There are bike lanes planned for thoroughfares throughout town, but close to the center Raleigh will not be following the example of Berlin or Amsterdam, with their dedicated bike lane systems. Raleigh is going a more American route, believing separate-but-equal to be false (and difficult to fund).
Sharrows will be a common bike accommodation on roads near downtown. Sharrow sounds like a cross between narrow and shared-with-cars, which doesn’t seem like safe - or fun - biking. Eric Lamb, manager of the Transportation Services Division of Raleigh’s Public Works Department, sort of confirmed this. Sharrow means a bike emblem with chevrons painted onto the lane of traffic. There is no bike-car separation, just a repeated reminder to cars to share the road, and a cue to bikes to move into the center of the lane and away from dangerous opening car doors.
The Raleigh Bike Facilities map proposes sharrows instead of bike lanes on approximately 50% of downtown streets, an area where it seems bike traffic will be relatively heavy. Lamb said this is because biking downtown is already pretty pleasant due to the low speed limit making bikes easily integrated into traffic. The existing buildings - and desire for street parking - limit street width so there’s often no room to add a lane.
Sharrows are also used to connect different sections of a bike lane. I asked about the sharrow sections of Hillsborough Street: cars drive quickly and often seem impatient to pass bikers between NC State and downtown, and some of that section of road is going to be completely redesigned anyway, so why not add a bike lane? The answer: Lamb said the project currently involves removing road width, so adding bike lanes along the entire length of Hillsborough Street isn’t feasible.
Sharrows are a somewhat new idea, in line for approval by the Federal Highway Administration. Effectiveness studies have been done by several cities, and according to San Francisco’s Shared Lane Marking Full Report, sharrows increase the distance between bikes and parked cars by three to eight inches, and increase the distance between motorists and bicyclists by two feet. NC State has the only sharrows in Raleigh so far, along Dan Allen Drive.
Bike bloggers are solidly on both sides of the fence. Some see sharrows as an inexpensive alternative for roads where bike lanes would never be approved, and safer because bikes ride in the center with the exact same traffic status as cars (a status they have always held, but rarely exercise). Lamb cited one Cary cyclist who calls bike lanes “segregation lanes”. Others see sharrows as a lame move by politicians to make their city look more bike friendly without having to make a large investment - or give up any space for cars. Some cyclists argue that bike lanes also increase bike ridership.
The Comprehensive Plan does not include a hard timeline or funding element, so it’s impossible to say when any of these accommodations will be finished. Completion of some improvements will hopefully happen when particular roads come up for resurfacing. Eventually, it seems, our downtown will look a little more like those at the turn of the previous century - though instead of Model Ts and horse carts it will be cars, bikes, and pedicabs all using the same pavement.
The Raleigh 2030 Comprehensive Plan is available for comments until January 31, 2009.
Politics , Other posts by Aislinn.
Downtown Raleigh Transit City Council Raleigh 2030 Comprehensive Plan Bicycles
what about Segway Scooter lanes?
The word “sharrow”, as you probably know, derives from shared+arrow, not “narrow”. Chapel Hill has them on MLK/86, but yes Dan Allen at State was first. Bike lanes do not provide “bike-car separation” at intersections where turning motorists cross the path of through cyclists—important because most car-bike crashes happen in intersections. In fact, bike lanes encourage “right hook” type crashes. Poorly designed and poorly implemented bike lanes contribute to many crashes.
In the central business district, where
speeds are relatively slow,
multiple lanes in the same direction are the norm,
trip distances are short,
congestion is heavy,
street parking and alleyways abound, and
modes are diverse (cars, trucks, delivery vehicles, buses, the “trolley”, pedicabs, segways, bikes, horses, skaters and pedestrians),
segregating cyclists to a narrow substandard dirty “lane” would cause more problems than it would solve. We’re much better off encouraging everyone to share the lanes, including bike police and the visitor’s bureau bike ambassadors (who too often set bad examples).
I would argue that installing bike lanes where sharing lanes is appropriate is, in your words, “a lame move by politicians to make their city seem more bike friendly without having to make a large investment or give up any car space.”
As a cyclist for 23 years, some of which was in NYC using dedicated biking lanes, I find bike lanes to be dirty, frequently blocked, and extremely dangerous at intersections (which are already the most deadly place on the road for cyclists). While they may encourage more cycling, they certainly won’t make cyclists any safer. If a cyclist does not feel comfortable cycling on a downtown street right now with no marked cycling lanes, they might have no business biking on city streets at all, bike lanes or not.
Currently living in DC. I was riding in a car with my boss to a job site the other day and he was driving the bike lane for a good 3 blocks - as I was telling him how much I like to bike and had even commuted to work on my bike several times. His response: “If I didn’t do it, someone else would.” Sure enough, when he got back into traffic, another car used the bike lane as a shortcut around a traffic circle.
I still prefer the bike lanes just because at least drivers can pass without swerving around even when I’m in the middle of the lane (and going the speed).
The key to being safe is visibility in either situation.
I’ve biked in Minneapolis and in Raleigh. I used bike lanes in Minneapolis when ever I could, but also had to ride the roads with out. Both are do able, but with the bike lanes you are able to focus on biking more than the car coming up beside you and if that woman in that parked car up ahead is going to see you before she decides to open her door and smack you with it….
I mean come on people, why sell ourselves short? Bikers deserve their own space!
Just my thoughts ![]()
Separating individuals using a public facility (such as a road) on the basis of class (cyclist, motorist, etc.) is usually perceived as increasing safety, but actually the opposite occurs at junctions (where the paths of travelers often cross).
Fortunately, it’s possible to “have your cake and eat it too”: a built up area can be redesigned to keep the top speed of drivers so low that the space can be shared in relative safety by everyone. One such design approach is known as “Shared Space”.
The Bike Facilities Map looks like the work of a strung-out spider with a box of rainbow sharpies.
A+ Aislinn
You should have seen the maps when they were soliciting public input! There were so many lines from sharpies you could barely tell what was going on! They held community events and invited cyclists to come out and comment on what they would like to see as far as routes and facilities. Thats how this spider’s web got so tangled.
I think this is a step in the right direction, is it perfect? Nope. But it’s a heck of a lot better than what exists here now.
Bike lanes? Don’t want them. If you have ever hit a car door on a bike while riding in the bike lane you know people have no regard for the lanes. I wonder if there will be any stiffer fines or tickets for blocking these lanes with a car or if you are caught driving in it?
I agree that bike lanes are probably not the best when there is street parking, but I think we need them outside of downtown. This town is not friendly at all to bikes outside of downtown. I commute to just north of the beltline from the downtown area, and would love to feel a lot safer when I am biking. I take the “bike routes” designated by the city, but many people cannot wait five seconds for a chance to pass in the other lane. They instead come within a foot or two of me in the same lane. If there was a bike lane, then it would not be a problem for me or them.
I have no problem biking downtown and the surrounding areas, currently. The traffic is not too heavy on most roads, with the exceptions probably being Morgan, McDowell/Dawson, and Person/Blount. This is one reason why their map is messed up. They have put bike routes on all of these streets. These are the roads that people commute into/through town on and the traffic will always be heavy. Bikes should be given priority on the other streets (Wilmington/Salisbury and any of the other East/West streets) for everyone’s safety.
Hey Ken—That’s a good observation—bike routes should be on *less* heavily trafficked streets that are *parallel to* the major commuting corridors for cars. This concept is known as “bicycle boulevards” and could be implemented in much of ITB Raleigh with relative ease, as the streets are highly interconnected.
New York City is working on a bit more extensive version of these Boulevards. Check out the “Broadway Boulevard” project (here is pdf of a presentation: http://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/downloads/pdf/broadwayblvd.pdf).
They even have separate traffic lights for the bike lanes!!! A red left turn arrow for cars while a green light for bikes! Looks like it could only work on one way streets.
If Raleigh needs an American city upon which to model it bicycle policies, Portland OR is the town to emulate.
“Safety is maximized when PERCEIVED risk is greater than ACTUAL risk.”
We don’t need bike lanes downtown. Thanks, Mr. Lamb for that smart move.
Meant to say, we cyclists don’t need bike lanes downtown. Again, good move, Mr. Lamb. This cyclist thanks you.
Come show your support for more bicycle infrastruce in Raleigh with Critical Mass. Meet today at the NSCU belltower at 5:00pm. Ride leaves at 5:30. This is a fun, leisurly, non-aggressive ride. We’ll end up somewhere to socialize and get coffee/drinks. Bring a friend, lights, and a lock.
This ride happens the last friday of every month if you can’t make this one.
Share Your Thoughts
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.