Mark Thursday, March 13, 2008

Architecture

Renovation Right: House Addition by Kenneth E Hobgood Architects

Does the house in the above photo look like a good tear-down candidate?  Many Raleigh residents might think so, but not homeowners John and Betty Aldridge, who took a more patient and respectful approach to expanding their living situation.  Setback requirements prevented an additional bedroom on the ground level, but through the guidance of Kenneth E Hobgood Architects, the owners were able to find a solution that accommodates all of their needs.  The existing structure is utilized, though reconfigured on the interior, and the addition attaches to it in a strikingly contemporary manner.Click Image for Slideshow
This metal, wood, and glass addition is formally interpreted as a sort of dormer, maintaining a quiet profile from the street front, yet introducing a modern language to the neighborhood.

Sited in an affluent Inside the Beltline neighborhood where land is worth as much as 1.5 million per acre, this project is a great example of how tearing down and rebuilding the house would have been an easy fix, but brain power was used to reach a more cost-effective, more respectful solution. 

Construction is underway, and the progress can be seen while driving along Glenwood Avenue between St. Mary’s and Oberlin Road.  This bold residential project will be an interesting tick mark in the timeline of Raleigh’s architectural history, and is an important example in the ongoing discussion of tear-downs.Click Image for Slideshow

images: Kenneth E Hobgood Architects and newraleigh.com

Read More Architecture

Filed Under:

  • Rusty03/13 10:33 AM

    Hobgood has some amazing talent. I hope we get a chance to actually tour this in person. The few images here are cool, but I’d like to see what it looks like built!

  • Sean03/13 10:56 AM

    Maybe it is me, but if I was a neighbor I would prefer a teardown in comparison to this structure. This looks like a space station type structure and will stand out further from existing homes. Bad decision.

  • Rusty03/13 11:07 AM

    It appears (just based on the shape & size of the addition) That they very intentionally made sure the structure will not be visible to neighbors (except the couple direct neighbors from their respective backyards.)

    It’s most certainly a cause for debate… What’s the best way to respect the neighborhood but still add on to your existing square footage?

  • RaleighRob03/13 02:17 PM

    I’m impressed.  From the street, it still looks like a nice lil bungalow. 
    Even if the addition looks a little space-age...I’d take that over a McMansion anyday!

  • map03/13 04:14 PM

    I love it.  I think the discontent with such a modern insertion might stem from the need to rethink our traditional forms of architecture, especially houses.  Many of the forms that are still used today have roots in a different era.  The needs of that time are not the same as the needs of this time, or of this climate.  It seems like this renovation has focused on the needs of the clients and bettering their home with added light and space in a well-designed form, and also with a minimal impact upon the ground.

  • Dana03/13 07:52 PM

    Talk about looking “out of place”! Yes, it is a concealed expansion, but good luck trying to sell that thing on the market. Bing Crosby meets David Bowie or Great White meets the Boston Pops? Looks more like the latter.

  • David03/13 09:30 PM

    I like how it’s designed to enjoy the trees that they didn’t have to cut down.

  • MSP03/13 10:03 PM

    Not my taste at all but I’m glad they are able to build what they want without any interference from the city, neighbors or community scale.

  • zygote03/13 10:04 PM

    For those who can’t appreciate well thought out objects this design has already received a state design award and has not even been built yet.  Recognitions such as are not easy to come by and are decided by renowned design experts from across the country.  Food for thought.

  • RaleighRob03/14 08:16 AM

    ^^ Of course not....neither the city, Community Scale nor probably the neighbors would have a problem with it, as compared to knocking it down and replacing it with a ridiculously tall McMansion.  tongue laugh

  • MSP03/14 12:57 PM

    ^^ Well fortunately it appears the city is letting neighborhoods decide whether something is ridiculously oversized or not instead of directly interfering with sweeping zoning changes.  A house being too big, too small, to modern or whatever are all opinions and the decision should be left to the property owner.  I know my neighborhood has decided that is the correct direction to take.

  • Roberto03/16 08:28 PM

    At least its not a spec house. It seems whenever a real homeowner makes decisions on renovating or rebuilding it’s always more thoughtful than the spec houses that represent the renew Raleigh club. When folks like MSP say “interference from the city, neighbors or community scale” what they are really talking about is spec houses. More often than not is the houses built by developers - spec buildings - that are grossly out of place.

  • Christopher Triplett03/19 01:47 PM

    Neato!

    Something good to offset all the grotesque architecture we’ve been putting up with as of late.

    -CJT

    http://ginkotron.com

  • ooooooooo mmyyyyyyy ggggggggggoodness03/19 07:59 PM

    I drove by this the other day thank you for including it in your ugly building projects

  • everett f boykin03/21 09:26 AM

    I don’t believe neighborhoods are deciding what is ridiculously large, small or just right. Otherwide the home on the corner of Yarmouth and Wheeler in the North Coley Forest area would never have been built. I know people who live “in its shadow” and the feel they are living across the street from a hotel.Oversized. Overdone. And over staying its welcome.

  • evalicious03/22 06:58 PM

    wow this look pretty tricked out to me....when can i move in? love it!

  • Myobservation03/25 10:09 AM

    When does this new NASA satellite tracking station become operational?

  • Myobservation03/25 10:12 AM

    This is almost as bad as McConnell’s new La Quinta Inn he is building on Lakeview Dr.

  • Christopher Triplett03/25 10:30 AM

    It definitely does not compare the La Quinta in on Lakeview (VOMIT!) I agree with the comment, but it really has little to do with this article.

    This addition is really making an otherwise plain house look very modern.  I think the front could do with some work though.

    -CJT

    http://ginkotron.com

  • Myobservation03/25 10:39 AM

    I like the Hobgood house and it has nice scale.  But, I agree with you about the front.  That is the only thing that throws me.  It doesn’t fit my taste, but hey he can build what he wants.

  • Dana04/21 08:18 AM

    FYI, this project, as proposed, would not make it through the NCOD process because of its detour from the character of the neighborhood.

    Is the NCOD what we really want? Is this project what we really want? One argument for this renovation is that the homeOWNERS deserve to do what they want with their property, exactly the argument of people proposing replacement houses.

  • freshsqueze04/21 08:26 AM

    Hey Dana,

    Let’s see some evidence for this claim.  Is that your opinion that this would not make it through the process?

  • Christopher Triplett04/21 11:07 AM

    Dana,

    I agree people should have free reign over their own property...but:

    Because everyone has to see a home in an Urban or Suburban setting, there should be checks and balances.

    The best path towards this is getting everyone in a neighborhood on board to meet at a common ground.  There is also a lot of value in bringing in a third party, especially a professional third party.  Unfortunately neighborhoods aren’t always equipped to do this alone.  Age demographics which vary more and more as neighborhoods age are a definite damper to a self starting committee.

    The NCOD process is really only a party to zoning changes.  Single family residences are easily designed around and constructed within existing zoning ordinances.  Setbacks and maximum heights are usually fine as is.  Therefore the majority of renovations, remodels, rebuilds, tear downs should be unaffected by the NCOD process.  Zoning changes should be harder, especially in established neighborhoods.

    But as to people doing what they want, the waves of change are a part of the history and dynamic appeal of any real neighborhood.  Stylistically planned neighborhoods are grotesque.

    Let things ebb and flow...just not too much ebbing.

    CJT

    http://Ginkotron.com

  • Faith04/23 03:17 PM

    I won’t be the first person to have said this, but WTH is up with people tearing down perfectly good, cute, small-ish houses in order to replace them with oversized, I-got-my-blueprints-out-of-a-gumball-machine monstrosities?  Why does every person need 3000 square feet in which to dwell?  This is why the South has maintained so little of its history…

  • freshsqueze04/23 03:42 PM

    Faith,

    This phenomenon comes from a vicious cycle where, undersocialized good-ol-boy workaholics spend all of their time building their careers and business relationships to the point where they don’t know how, nor do they have the desire to, talk to their families, so they need these vast expanses of square footage to minimize their chances of human interaction with the people they actually know the least in their lives. 

    The sad truth in this is reflected throughout our capitalist, materialistic culture: family values are perverted far from where they began, and the facades of these now empty moral ideals hide behind pretentious religious institutions and within the false realities of mass-communication satellite broadcasts.

    Is it any surprise that 90% of the unhappiest spouses in this country are married to the most successful of businessmen?  (They are also the most heavily medicated.)

    As long as we have no real family values or relationships, we might as well get what we want (money) and rape the Earth with 6,000 square foot “homes” in the process.

  • Faith04/24 07:54 AM

    freshsqueze...there’s a lot of truth in what you said.  it’s a sad state of affairs.

    as for the ‘pretentious religious institutions,’ I’m concerned that some of these are building multi-million dollar compounds while others are struggling to pay their pastors enough to feed their children. but that’s probably for another page…

Welcome to New Raleigh. We welcome your participation in the ongoing discussion. If you are new we invite you to register with our site. With registration you can upload a picture, message other users, and comment more easily. If you want to keep up with the site, subscribe to our RSS feed or get emailed every time we post.




Remember my information for next time I comment

Send me an email of follow-up comments?