
The City Council’s reflexive, automatic, predictable approval of the Stanhope and Cameron Village towers should be illustrative enough of the meaninglessness of Raleigh’s Comprehensive Plan as to remove it from the serious list. Despite all the grand talk, it is a matter of history that a great majority of our elected officials seem possessed of the vision of a Chihuahua, the backbone of a frankfurter and the ethics of a five dollar road whore. I’m not much of a bettin’ man, but I saw this one coming so far off that there was no sense in keeping up with the news, automatic. I’m not to the level of insouciance of Joe. That’s next.
“I don’t give a shit,” says Joe. “They do what they are told. It don’t mean shit.”
And that part is true. When the big Indians say jump and come across with the campaign bucks, the compliant lick-spittles infesting city “government” never ask how high, they just start hopping until the cookie comes. Predictably disgusting and compliant to the only thing that matters in this obsolete, fading, dusty, backwater empire called the USA – money.
A micro-history to illustrate to y’all just how pro-forma, tedious and repetitive are the fortunes, for instance, of the Clark Avenue/Peace Street corridor. In the post WWII era, Raleigh, somewhat unbelievably had a “comprehensive plan.” Peace Street, where the tatty rundown commercial strip now is segueing into a faux stucco condo mondo, was a residential overlay which was scuttled, obliterated by the snap of a finger by a certain small-town tin-horn Mussolini clutching the fun-bucks. It might be worth noting that one of those businesses that prospered by the micro-imperial edict was Mr. “Drive Friendly,” Avery Upchurch and his Esso filling station at the corner of Glenwood and Peace. Upchurch, the long-time resident may recall,became Raleigh mayor after an intensive stand-up political tutorial consisting of pouring fuel into Willie York’s Lincoln for forty or so years. Shoot, the York Empire moved an entire creek out of its banks to make way for profits, profits, profits by way of the Cameron Village development, creating and exacerbating an erosive, alien watercourse still in Edna Metz Wells Park, where nature never intended. This latest silly shit is nothing close to news.
Look, y’all, allowing money to undercut a carefully and thoughtful consensus-based policy is a transparent knee-jerk management strategy that makes an empty mockery of all the pretty words. The physical reality resulting from this mediocre, hollow method renders to a mere a laughable stage show the hokum of stated intentions. How silly the pompous little blather, serving only to reinforce how important we like to think others see us, when in fact, years later, if you are remembered at all, you are just as chaff, fibers blown on the wind, nothing. All your big words are dross, forgotten when attended by the fading empty, narcotic jolt of a new, big project, celebrated for just its size, not the long-term implications of what and where it is—money, money, money, jobs, jobs, jobs (claimed)—an empty and pathetically thin view of the urban.
“I feel I have a real fiduciary responsibility to the city to make sure we have good development that would help the city as a whole,” Council Nancy McFarlane was quoted, never taking the time to clarify how these two infrastructure burdening turds qualify as “good” development nor how these things are supposed to help the city.
Look, toots, how about an abattoir? What if Smithfield Foods or Perdue got a great price on land and announced plans to build a food processing plant, say, in the Crabtree floodplain? Oh, look at the fiduciary responsibility of all those slaughterhouse jobs. Nancy, you are asking the voters to buy into a view possessed of all the sophistication of a sixth grader. If it’s money, by golly, it must be good. This is the sort of simplistic logic that as gotten the US and world where we are now, via the jolt of the short term bucks and construction jobs which ride in soon to be forgotten amid the sundering of the fabric of neighborhoods brought by these sorts of generational paroxysms of construction/destruction, construction/destruction. There is no view toward the future, just an immediate fix.
In the face of this consistent undercutting, how is Raleigh’s comprehensive plan any more substantive that an addict’s pathetic attempts to make the family feel better with the next gold-plated lie?
“I’m quitting next week, dear.”
“Oh,” she tells her friends, “he’s trying to get well.”
It’s not my fault, says the addict. It’s the dealer, someone, not oneself when in fact Raleigh, like a hardcore addict, is the worst sort of liar, lying to oneself, swapping her soul, the long term and a couple of measly bucks for the next bag of dope. Amid the great public resolve, the lofty talk about amending one’s ways, there you are on the street scrounging for a bag of smack.
“Oh this one little shot won’t hurt. I’m not really a junkie, I’m just ... just ... I’m weak. “
My little town, an adolescent junkie, wrapped up in the immediate thrill—that’s it—no thought about what is going to happen, more and more slow-motion disasters someone else has to deal with twenty, thirty years later ‘cause someone was thinking only about the short-term profits to be made by the consultants, planners, architects, contractors and suppliers. Anyone remember the Fayetteville Street Mall? Yes ma’am: money, money, money, money money. Darlin’, which substantive, reliable entity would want to make a real investment here given Raleigh’s demonstrated absence dependability, consistency and forethought? I submit that as long as this sort of midway razzle-dazzle thinking prevails, evidenced by, for example, the Prison sneak-job or Raleigh’s inability to muster some sort of actual and needed mass transit plan, Raleigh is doomed to be remain bobbing in a back-water pond along with the rest of the third-tier cities, our status displayed by silly shit like our—of necessity—cut-rate convention center, Marbles museum, failed bank headquarter buildings and so forth.
Ptrblt , Other posts by Peter Eichenberger.
City Council Cameron Village Petrblt York Properties Cameron Village Towers
I didn’t know that the Montana Freemen offered a creative writing class. Get over yourself.
I think this is the worst thing I’ve ever read on this site. I concur with TSnow, get a grip.
The Council has completely disregarded the City Planning Department in every way, shape, and form here. Do you have any idea how difficult it is to have something pass which goes against the Comprehensive Plan in this city? Citizens of Raleigh, and everyone who’s ever been denied rezoning due to a Small Area Plan in the CP should be outraged by this decision.
In the midst of economic crisis, why don’t we just grant Emergency Powers to Mayor Meeker, to make sure that everyone who’s approved for a construction loan to be allowed to build whatever they choose, regardless of what the City has comprehensively planned for?
I’ve been back in Raleigh for a few years now after mostly living in other places since ‘89.
It’s nice to have more restaurants but it’s sad to see that nothing has fundamentally changed in any truly positive direction for the city as a whole that I can see.
Honestly, if I wasn’t so broke, I’d already be gone.
Does it get cold up there all alone on your pedestal? You’re such a hypocrite.
this really is terrible. I’m used to excessive bitching and moaning and on this site, but not in such awful “pedestallic” fashion.
This could be rewritten into a single paragraph. Writing is not the same as speaking.
Blah blah…Money BAD, my ideas, GOOD…blah blah, waaaah, politicians didnt follow through on promises…blah blah blah.
I want my five min. back.
You’ve got way to much time on your hands. The City’s plans are used as guides in decision making. The folk that cling to the COMP PLAN or nothing belief, are the ones that control the planning process. And most of them don’t want anything to change in their backyard.
Have you looked at the city’s debt load lately? They need development to pay it off.
Such hysteria! More than half the Raleigh population now lives north of I-440, and we really don’t care about the melodramas of small-scale developments like this.
I am so tired of New Raleigh readers personally attacking its writers. We should be grateful for a forum to discuss our city and thank all the contributors who volunteer their time to make it happen. Even if we don’t agree with the content, let’s be respectful of the effort.
Pete, it’s time to get some help or have your medication checked, seriously.
Twenty-twenty hindsight is a beautiful thing.
The “car culture” has not worked out all that well and no doubt some of the more prescience individuals in America saw the writing on the wall back in the day. The bulk of folks on this site came to that conclusion as well - maybe a bit later than some but probably earlier than the good citizens seeking to make the most of life on one cul-de-sac or another.
I feel the Raleigh’s leadership is one of the few civic crowds ahead of the curve when compared to the rest of the Nation - but it’s not perfect.
And the enemy of “good enough” is perfect - not everything that comes down the pike can be expected to rise to the level of ideal, perfect, wise and brilliant - but it’s good there are watchdogs to keep raising the bar. Complacency would be the enemy of better.
Development is a form of Capitalism - risk and profit are real inhibitors and motivators - and a blank slate of approval is no different then the mess of deregulation on Wall Street - but somewhere there is a balance that mandates “good enough” and sometimes there exists the perfect storm of grace, principle and design that allows near perfection to arrive.
So for me - unless we can locate reasonable citizens of NY City screaming to day-light the multitude of creeks and streams buried in Manhattan - as well as the return of private single family homes along Fifth Avenue - the negative response to the CV project is -IMO - a bit ridiculous and over blown - much like this article. Development is going to happen - and not all of it perfect.
I’m glad they are folks on top of the situation, riding the powers-that-be to be respectful of form and design, but negotiation requires that both sides give - and sometimes one side has to give more than the other.
I felt that the original Coker Towers was “good enough” - and I still feel it’s was a damn site better than the crap that is there now. I hope that the urban-design watchdog citizens are mindful of their power to kill “good enough” just so hideous can take it’s place.
Ryan: i’ve seen new raleigh authors personally attack their readers and comment-givers. i have no sympathy for the author or NR in this situation. they should be able to take a fair amount of well-deserved criticism when so much of NR is built upon them criticizing other folks.
Whoa !
The back and forth !
This is IT !
Now were really sharing ideas !!
Plus !, bitchin’ title graphic dudes.
I’ve been looking for something to add under my Cat in the Hat quasi Primus backplate tattoo.
Allison—-
“Pete, it’s time to get some help or have your medication checked, seriously.”
Do you consider this ‘criticism’?
The development/no development argument in this area of our city has been going on for years. Its change vs. no change. It’s—- put that development in another area, and make sure it looks just like I think it should look. But it’s only natural to have different types of development in different parts of our city. Given the high price of gas, I don’t see how we continue to have large communities out in the burbs.
We are therefore going to need more development closer to jobs and, higher densities. And our elected leaders must take a stand on whether they support infill type development at higher densities in more established areas, or whether they continue to cow-tow to a few folks who don’t want any change or new development in their backyard.
So, we expect “radical” development to happen as citizens.
-
If a developer came to town and wants to build a high rise with 600-900 square foot lofts that run 110k to 170k…wouldn’t most people react with “No low income housing!” But what if these lofts had granite floors, Euro appliances, high end installations, etc. Most people would have the same reaction regardless of the facts.
-
Why is that? Subconsciously we have expectations that are relative to our environment and upbringing. If developers don’t closely cater to that, they don’t sell anything. The City Council certainly can’t be expected to make the citizens of Raleigh more open minded.
-
We can all bitch about the City Council. But if we don’t find candidates with more open minds (who we can expect to actively communicate and not foster hidden agendas) and subsequently elect them, then we can’t bitch. YOU elected them.
-
You can go the council meetings. And you can even communicate with the developer! How about YOU create a conceptual development and show it to someone. Say, this is what Raleigh really wants! And maybe someone will take a look at it, and see some room for compromise.
-
Many of the folks that like to complain in general, can’t produce an alternative. So unless you can say, “this is better!” you’re not really saying anything at all.
I believe the car culture—and the suburbs that came with it—have worked out just fine. It’s imperfect and it doesn’t suit everyone, but those who don’t like it can move to a place where there is a viable downtown that provides the lifestyle they want.
Those of us who moved to north Raleigh a long time ago specifically because we liked its lifestyle—difficult as that may be for some people to understand—are tiring of the social engineers who want to reinvent Raleigh per their own values. I’m a Democrat and I’d rather see an inside-the-beltline Democrat mayor and council than an outside-the-beltline Republican mayor and council. But the Meeker Majority, such as it is, won’t last forever. As the city continues to annex along I-540, eventually the voting power in Raleigh will change… so that city government is no longer the playground of inside-the-beltline activists.
First, “towers” my ass.
2nd, I’ve said this before and I’ll say it again… avoiding, for a moment, whether Stanhope and Cresent are consistent with the comp plan or are even good developments or not, why does this site continue to avoid a discussion about the unquestionably more lousy garbage that gets thrown up in NE Raleigh or Brier Creek? Is that not Raleigh? Someone write a column on that.
It’s imperfect and it doesn’t suit everyone, but those who don’t like it can move to a place where there is a viable downtown that provides the lifestyle they want. ,
IMO the “car culture” killed the viable downtowns - and the “option” has had to be rebuilt without the benfit of any viable transit - other than the car.
And how is the “social engineering” mentioned any different from the mindless urban planning done in accordance with the needs of cars and car alone?
Comments should be related to the topic discussed in the associated article or blog post. In order to keep the conversation relevant, off-topic comments may be edited or removed.
Share Your Thoughts
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.